To Autumn Essay -- To Autumn John Keats English Literature Essays

To AutumnI find this to be a deeply enjoyable numbers. I take delight in it, razethough I recognize in it some inadequacy. But, frankly, I like it bestof on the whole of Keatss work and know it by memory. It all comes togethernicely and has an exceptionally fine ending.I do not have it off anyparticular interpretative problems with this work. The poem is alyrical elicitation of autumn with a complex tonal blend which bothcelebrates autumns affluence and wistfully regrets its sense of lossand ending. There is nothing in the poem which induces me to seek outa deeper level of meaning, since I retrieve that poem operates, for themost part, at a very literal level.I suffice well to the mimeticdepiction of autumn in the work (even though it is a variant kind ofautumn than the one I am familiar with) and I am generally inclined toenjoy seasonal verse and its various potentialities for lyricalexpression. I dont find anything in the poem that gets to me in amoral or philosophical se nse. I am not in any sense, moved by thepoem as some kind of--as many scholars claim it is--meditation ondeath. I merely dont see that here. It would seem that my pleasure istaken primarily in the artistic qualities of the work. However, thereis something wrong with the work on this score the three differentstanzas dont match and fit one another as well as they might thereis some clumsiness in the work, especially as one moves from onestanza to the next. These faults, however, are not so serious as tomar the excellence of the work.The general plan of To Autumn isrelatively simple. As a whole, the poem is a lyrical description ofautumn in terms of certain objects, processes, and events associatedwith that season, or... ...a beautiful poem. There are,of course, flaws in the work--loose ends, slips in morphologicalcoherence--and these have been noted and, we hope, accounted for. Butthe remainder of the grounds points to that kind of anomalousinterrelatedness of elements which is above all the hallmark of abeautiful thing. To be sure, To Autumn is not a very great poemeven without the flaws, it is a relatively modest achievement thevery subtle complexity and sophistication of a Shakespearean sonnet,the dynamically brilliant beauty of Miltonic verse, the blindingprecision of Pope are certainly not in evidence here. Even within thescope of Keatss entire work, if To Autumn lacks some of the muchproblematic discontinuities and lapses to be found in his very bestwritings, it also lacks some of the felicities of aesthetic form to befound in these homogeneous works.