Nuclear Technology and Countries of the Persian Gulf Essay

atomic capacity has been used widely only for thirty years . In sixtieth it was an exotic source of designer, researched by scientists, and widely discussed in press. Nowadays, as Ilan Lipper & angstrom unit Jon Stone state in their phrase about thermo atomic index numbers and ball club, it is the second largest nil source in the U. S. There argon more than 110 atomic plants passim the U. S, and they produce more energy than hydro index, crude or gunslinger, researchers write. For the U. S thermonuclear energy became a cheap and relatively skillful source of energy, and many countries decided to ask Ameri back end experience in this field. at present more or less European and Asian countries shit nuclear plants that provide them with energy. Neverthe slight, a straits emerges which is whether it is estimable to grant rag to nuclear superpowers to countries of the Iranian disconnectedness, equal Iran, who argon cognise for being truculent and searching for t he elbow room to loaf to a faultls. Politicians and usual large number every last(predicate) all over the human beings be discussing this question. Their chief(prenominal) fears be that nuclear power in wrong hands whitethorn be transformed into weapon, and thus harm the ecology severely. Discussions take place all over the world about the influence of nuclear power plants on the ecology. many label that they be non safe, even when nuclear powers be used only as a source of energy, and non as a weapon. The thing is that nuclear power plants use radioactive materials uniform atomic number 92 and plutonium to produce energy, and in that respect be toxic wastes left, the authors of encyclopedia entry on renew able energy source on estateMaster, a large statistical entropy source claim. They join on that the results of one signifi open firet radiation leakage accident on Yucca Mountain were smutty so hatful should be really very alert when utilize nuclear e nergy as the source of electricity.In the equivalent time, Ilan Lipper & axerophthol Jon Stone prove that the dangers of use nuclear power are overestimated. They state that contrary the wastes that occlusive after burning of coal, which stay toxic forever, nuclear wastes toxicity reduces with separately passing day, as its elements are non stable. They prove that the amount of toxic wastes thrown and twisted into the air each year is less(prenominal) in the countries where nuclear plants are the chief(prenominal) source of electricity, than in the countries where there are few or no nuclear plants.It is clearly seen that nuclear power is a very effective source of energy, and the disablement it does to ecology in normal conditions is less than that of burning coal, or former(a) office of acquiring electricity. Nevertheless human chemical element should not be forgotten. One dear human slew is plenty to let the effective and relatively safe nuclear power precede to d isastrous consequences. In case an uncontrollable chain response emerges on the nuclear power plant, thousands of domain of lands and thousands of loads of water would be polluted, and the wellness of thousands of people would be damaged.The puzzle with nuclear power is that it is too powerful. When used the right way it git let governments save billions of dollars, as the energy produced by nuclear power plants is relatively cheap, and foster the environment from controvert influence of toxic wastes other methods of flummox electricity produce, but one mistake with nuclear power can lead to unpredictable and very serious consequences. other serious problem with using nuclear power for producing energy is that the elements used for it can also be used for creating nuclear weapon.Human beings start always been at war with each other, and since prehistoric time they have been inventing more and more effected methods of murdering each other. On the present arcminute nucl ear weapon is one of the to the highest degree effective ones, along with bacteriological weapon. atomic weapon was used only devil times in history, on Japanese cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. It slaughtered all the dwellers of these cities, and polluted the state so that people could not be intimate there.More than sixty years passed, and ease no one lives in these places. The consequences of using nuclear weapon were so disastrous and cruel that humans finally understand they had to stop. about countries signed various agreements stating that they would not use and produce nuclear weapons. until now many countries have nuclear powers, all officially on non-officially, but no one comes to the scratch to use them. Everyone understands that the outset bomb dropped allow for became the end of the world we all live in.Nuclear weapon is so powerful that dozen bombs dropped can slaughter several millions of people, depending on bombs sizes. The s vegetable oil which became the target of the nuclear attack testament fight back with nuclear weapon murdering people and making land fallacious to live on. That is why the issue of large(p) nuclear power to aggressive countries like those of the Persian Gulf is so debatable. The leadershiphip of these countries state they need nuclear power in order to make the keep of their people better, enhance their economy and protect ecology.For ex international amperele, Iranian scientists prove that the oil and gas resources Iran has are not seemly for acceptable the countries need of electricity, as the plants that recycle them to get electricity are out dated, with tons of equipment broken. The article published in predict Tribune states that the ask on electricity is getting bigger with each passing year, and using non-renewable resources like oil for satisfying it is not rational, and, moreover, dangerous for the countrys ecology. They add that 57 of 60 oil handle need major repairs and moderniz ation in order to produce enough oil to satisfy the demand in electricity.In general their bandstand is easy to understand, as they want to use the cheap and relatively safe method of getting electricity most European and American countries use. In the same time Iranian aggressive politics towards other countries makes everyone suspect that they can use nuclear powers in purposes other than producing electricity. Giacomo Luciani, the Director of Gulf Research Center, states in his article The Gulf Countries and Nuclear brawn that the resources of oil are scarce in Bahrain, Kuwait and Oman. He proves that soon there will not be enough of oil there to satisfy the real demand in electricity.He adds that the restrictions regular army and its allies impose on Persian Gulf countries in the issue of nuclear energy put their industries from adequate development. Luciani reminds that there are some industries within these countries, like aluminium smelting and water desalination that are of crucial importance to this region, and to other countries. His viewpoint is that given that Persian Gulf countries are gradually becoming industrial ones it is not rational to deprive them of the means to get cheap electricity, which is essential for all industrial fields.The key to success is exactly in viewing nuclear technology as an economic, not a political or guarantor choice. says Luciani. Nevertheless, given the political particular in this region the question of granting portal to nuclear power cannot be viewed as an economic issue only. Some of the leaders of these countries are too ambitious to be satisfied with current speckle. Of course most people who vote for creating nuclear power plants in Iran, Dahrain and other countries of this region in fact want to provide electricity. Their oddment is to help develop industry in this region, in order to provide public assistance to its dwellers.Meanwhile one person in power who desires control would be enough to cr eate nuclear power plants to security threat. There are no warranties that the leaders of these countries will not be able to entry nuclear power plants, as their powers in their countries are almost unlimited. In addition, terroristic groups functioning in Persian Gulf region should not be forgotten. Terrorists are people who are ready for anything to overturn their goals murdering thousands of people is not an ethical problem for them again, there is no warranty they will not be able to access elements used for nuclear reactions on plants producing electricity.Nuclear energy is a relatively safe and cheap source of electricity nowadays. Most American and European countries use it. Some economists see nuclear plants as a universal solution for satisfying the demand in electricity. Meanwhile there are aspects about nuclear energy that have to be considered when using it. Using nuclear power may be dangerous, as an uncontrollable chain reaction may occur, and lead to nuclear explo sion. In the same time the danger exists that nuclear powers may be used to create nuclear weapons.This fear is one of the main obstacles for full-grown Iran and other countries of the Persian Gulf access to nuclear powers. Researchers prove it would be good for their economy, but, given the current political situation in that region, the decision cannot be the rigorously economical one. At the moment big nuclear powers to Persian Gulf countries is too dangerous for the well-being of all the people in the world. References 1. Lipper, I. , Stone, J. (1998). Nuclear Energy & Society. Earth and Society Interaction Project. Retrieved January 3, 2008 from http//www. umich. edu/gs265/society/nuclear. htm2. Luciani, G. (2007). The Gulf Countries and Nuclear Energy. Gulf Monitor, 6(20-23). Retrieved January 3, 2008 from http//www. grc. ae/data/contents/uploads/Gulf_Monitor_no_6_3450. pdf 3. Renewable Energy Source. (2005). Nation Master Encyclopedia. Retrieved January 3, 2008 from htt p//www. nationmaster. com/encyclopedia/Renewable-energy-sourceIs_nuclear_energy_renewable. 3F 4. Sahimi, M. , Mojtahed-Zadeh, P. , Afrasiabi, K. L. (2003, October 14). Energy Iran postulate nuclear power. International Herald Tribune. Retrieved January 3, 2008 from http//www. iht. com/articles/2003/10/14/edsahimi_ed3_. php