Historical documen Essay

Do you believe every(prenominal)(prenominal) historic put down or nurse was trustworthy? Before, we restoration up if the historic documents or books are true first, we have to look at the historical answer with a different crest of mentation because it is easy to get sloping information if we lonesome(prenominal) focus on one side of the event. In the book After The Fact The View from the croupe Rail by James westernmost Davidson and Mark Hamilton Lytle, the authors demonstrate that discovering the historical falsehood of the freed people is difficult because histories deal with return caterpillar tread quite an than the bottom rail of the lower social classes. Therefore, the freed peoples history has be go on flawed.Writing roughly a historical event is super difficult, because we have to consider different points of view. Thus, if a historian centre on plainly one side of the story, the historical event will remain aslope. For example, the history of thrall dom was biased and was non accurate. According to the authors, the dumb strivers could non read or bring out during that beat even if someone could read, they had to entomb this skill from their masters. Then, almost of the written books or documents about slavery were written by the white masters. Therefore, the information was not only accurate but also biased because the information came from white masters rather than slaves who actually know the truth.Moreover, although the interviews came from slaves, almost every interviewee experienced slavery by his or her childhood therefore, the interviews were also biased because they focused on those who survived slavery. As the author explains, the vertical life expectancy of a slave in 1850 was less than fifty long time(Davison and Lytle 180). Thus, when they were interviewed by someone, they were old. Two-thirds of them were over 80 geezerhood old that could lead us to acquit that they were treated less harsh than former(a) people who died early because of harsher treatment in earlier years. Moreover, as interviewees get older, their memories could fade, and they could not certainly remember the details. This is common champion that if the event occurred a long time ago, the person could not remember every detail.In addition, the interviewees couldnt answer candidly because they were scared. One interviewee says, Ive told you too much. How come they want all this stuff from the coloured people anyway? Do you take any stories from the white people? (Davison and Lytle 183). akin the interviewee, other interviewees were also scared to spill out about what they really experienced because they thought speaking out candidly would put them in a trouble. Therefore, they could not answer honestly.In retrospect, the slave interviews stimulate flawed, and it was biased, because the interviews were not considering different points of view. Additionally, there was no voice recorder, which could provide us wi th what the interviewees authentically said to the interviewer. Therefore, when we look at historical events, we have to consider different points of view thus, we do not accept everything we just find out or read. As the authors state, we cannot believe everything at face look upon before we carefully discover.